Feasibility of transthoracic esophagectomy with a next-generation surgical robot

  • Lazzarino, IA et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends in use and associated outcomes in England. Ann. Surg. 252292-298 (2010).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Francescutti, V., Choy, I., Biertho, L., Goldsmith, CH, and Anvari, M. Gastrectomy and esophagogastrectomy for proximal and distal gastric lesions: a comparison of open and laparoscopic procedures. Surg. Innov. 16134-139 (2009).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Knitter, S. et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis . Anticancer Res. 413499-3510 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Darwish, MB et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy to reach R0. JSLS 24(e2020), 00060 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Giulianotti, PC et al. Robotics in General Surgery: Personal Experience in a Large Community Hospital. Arch Surg. 138777–784 (2003).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Morris, B. Robotic surgery: applications, limitations and impact on surgical training. MedGenMed seven72 (2005).

    PubMed
    PubMed Center

    Google Scholar

  • Janki, S., Mulder, EEAP, Ijzermans, JJN & Tran, TCK Ergonomics in the operating room. Surg. Endoc. 312457–2466 (2017).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Reyes, DAG, Tang, B. & Cuschieri, A. Morbidity syndromes related to minimal access surgery (MAS). Surg. Endoc. 201–13 (2006).

    Article
    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Stucky, CH et al. Symptoms, constraints and surgeon selections: systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics. Ann. Med. Surg. (London.) 271–8 (2018).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Coronado, PJ, Herraiz, MA, Magrina, JF, Fasero, M. & Vidart, JA Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robot-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy, and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. EUR. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Repr. Biol. 165289-294 (2012).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Lavoir, V. & Gotlieb, W. Benefits of minimal access surgery in elderly patients with pelvic cancer. Cancers (Basel) 812 (2016).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Jayaraman, S., Davies, W. & Schlachta, CM First steps with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Box. J. Surg. 52374–378 (2009).

    PubMed
    PubMed Center

    Google Scholar

  • Cheng, L., S. Fu, J. Liu, Z. Wang, and M. Fu. J. Surg. Oncol. 1241031-1039 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Angeramo, CA, Bras Harriott, C., Casas, MA & Schlottmann, F. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: robot-assisted technique versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Operation 1701692-1701 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Manigasso, M. et al. Robotic esophagectomy. A systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J.Pers. Med. 11640 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Grimminger, PP et al. Multicenter experience in minimally invasive robot-assisted esophagectomy – A comparison of hybrid and fully robot-assisted techniques. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 252463–2469 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Haig, F., Medeiros, ACB, Chitty, K. & Slack, M. Usability evaluation of Versius, a novel robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal-access surgery. BMJ surgery. Interv. Technology. Health 2e000028 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Hares, L., Roberts, P., Marshall, K. & Slack, M. Using End-User Feedback to Optimize the Design of the Versius Surgical System, a Novel Robot-Assisted Device for Use in Minimal-Access Surgery . BMJ surgery. Interv. Technology. Health https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000019December 2, 2019 (2019).

    Article
    PubMed
    PubMed Center

    Google Scholar

  • Carey, M., Bali, A., Pandeva, I., Pradhan, A. & Slack, M. Preclinical evaluation of a novel robot-assisted surgical system for use in minimal-access gynecological surgery. Gynecol. Surg. 172 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • McCulloch, P. et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 3741105–1112 (2009).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Sedrakyan, A. et al. IDEAL-D: A rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices. BMJ 353i2372 (2016).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Butterworth, J., Sadry, M. & Julian, D. Training program evaluation for versius, an innovative new robotic system for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ surgery. Interv. Technology. Health https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000057 (2021).

    Article
    PubMed
    PubMed Center

    Google Scholar

  • Morton, J. et al. Preclinical evaluation of the Versius Surgical System, a novel robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures. Surg. Endoc. 352169-2177 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Atallah, S., Parra-Davila, E. & Melani, AGF Evaluation of the Versius surgical robotic system for dual-field synchronous transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a preclinical model: Will tomorrow’s surgical robots promise new options?. Technology. Coloproctol. 23471–477 (2019).

    Article
    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Thomas, B. et al. Preclinical evaluation of the Versius Surgical System, a novel robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access kidney and prostate surgery. EUR. Urol. To concentrate seven444–452 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Borse, M., Godbole, G., Kelkar, D., Bahulikar, M., Dinneen, E., Slack, M. (2021) Early evaluation of a next-generation surgical system in laparoscopic total hysterectomy assisted by robot: a prospective clinical cohort study. JMIG.

  • Kelkar, DS, Kurlekar, U., Stevens, L., Wagholikar, GD, Slack, M. (2021) A first prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of the versius surgical system in robot-assisted cholecystectomy. Anne. surg.

  • Daabiss, M. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification of Physical Status. Indian J. Anaesth. 55111-115 (2011).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Meredith, K. et al. Comparative results of minimally invasive and robot-assisted esophagectomy. Surg. Endoc. 34814–820 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Kar, M. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: preservation of the arc of the Azygos vein in prone position. J.Minim. Access Surg. 17405–407 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Sharma, S. et al. Preservation of the azygos vein in the primary repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatrician Surg. Int. 231215-1218 (2007).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Yang, Y. et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: first results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005023 (2021).

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Sayed, AI, Goel, S., Aggarwal, A. & Singh, S. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity, and short-term oncologic outcomes-a single institutional experience. J.Robot. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01274-9 (2021).

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Christine E. Phillips